From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vignoli v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2020
Case No. CV 18-6618 JAK (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. CV 18-6618 JAK (PVC)

01-31-2020

DANIEL VIGNOLI, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff's Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Amended Report and Recommendation to which the Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. The Court also finds that the issues presented do not warrant a hearing, as requested by Petitioner.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered affirming the decision of the Commissioner and dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant.

JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDER. DATED: January 31, 2020

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Vignoli v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2020
Case No. CV 18-6618 JAK (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2020)
Case details for

Vignoli v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL VIGNOLI, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2020

Citations

Case No. CV 18-6618 JAK (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2020)