From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vigil v. Raemisch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 8, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-cv-2042-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Sep. 8, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-2042-WJM-MJW

09-08-2014

JOSEPH VIGIL, Plaintiff, v. RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, and DARYL PROFITT, Employee of C.D.O.C., Faith and Citizens Programs, Defendants.


Judge William J. Martínez

ORDER ADOPTING AUGUST 15, 2014 RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

This matter is before the Court on the August 15, 2014 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe (the "Recommendation") (ECF No. 52) that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 17) be granted. The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No. 52 at 12.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation have to date been received.

The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's analysis was thorough and sound, and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation."); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) ("In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate's report under any standard it deems appropriate.").

In accordance with the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows: (1) The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (ECF No. 52) is ADOPTED in its entirety; (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6) (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED; and (3) Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 10) is hereby DISMISSED. Plaintiff's defamation claim (Claim 2) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's remaining claims (Claims 1, 3 and 4) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay his own attorney's fees and costs.

Dated this 8th day of September, 2014.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

William J. Martínez

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Vigil v. Raemisch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 8, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-cv-2042-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Sep. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Vigil v. Raemisch

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH VIGIL, Plaintiff, v. RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 8, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-2042-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Sep. 8, 2014)