From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vigil v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02806-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02806-AP

04-19-2013

DIANA VIGIL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff : Nicholas Purifoy Disability Professionals For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J. BENEDICT GARCÍA Assistant United States Attorney THAYNE WARNER Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:
Nicholas Purifoy
Disability Professionals
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
THAYNE WARNER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: November 8, 2012
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: January 29, 2013
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: March 28, 2013

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters anticipated. With regard to prior judicial involvement, the parties note that this matter is not a matter on remand from this or any other court.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: May 27, 2013

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: June 26, 2013

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: July 11, 2013

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Both parties consent to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: ____________
Nicholas D. Purifoy
Disability Professionals
5020 Bob Billings Parkway, Ste. B
Lawrence, KS 66049
Telephone (785) 832-8521
E-mail:
npurifoy@mydisabilityprofessionals.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov
By: ____________
M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: (303) 844-7237
thayne.warner@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant


Summaries of

Vigil v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02806-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Vigil v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:DIANA VIGIL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 19, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-02806-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 19, 2013)