From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vigeant v. Macomber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2019
CASE NO. CV 15-628-GW (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 15-628-GW (PJW)

01-16-2019

ANTHONY VIGEANT, Petitioner, v. JEFF MACOMBER, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Final Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Final Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

The Court notes that there is a typo on page 21, line 18 of the Final Report wherein the magistrate judge refers to "Hernandez" instead of "Pettigrew." Other than that, the Court accepts the Final Report and Recommendation as written. --------

Further, for the reasons stated in the Final Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S 322, 336 (2003). DATED: January 16, 2019.

/s/_________

GEORGE H. WU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Vigeant v. Macomber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2019
CASE NO. CV 15-628-GW (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2019)
Case details for

Vigeant v. Macomber

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY VIGEANT, Petitioner, v. JEFF MACOMBER, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 16, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. CV 15-628-GW (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2019)