From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Viehmeyer v. Quijas

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 16, 2003
68 F. App'x 42 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion


68 Fed.Appx. 42 (9th Cir. 2003) Robbie VIEHMEYER, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. J. QUIJAS, Santa Ana Officer (# 1974); A. Blascovich, Santa Ana Officer (1800); M. Gonzalez, Santa Ana Officer (# 2137), Defendants--Appellees. No. 02-55781. D.C. No. CV-02-00113-DOC. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 16, 2003

Argued and Submitted June 4, 2003.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding.

Before THOMAS, PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and REED, District Judge.

The Honorable Edward C. Reed, Jr., United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

In view of our decision in the companion case of Viehmeyer v. City of Santa Ana, et. al., No. 02-56157, 2003 WL 21436250, 67 Fed.Appx. 470, this appeal is dismissed as moot.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Viehmeyer v. Quijas

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 16, 2003
68 F. App'x 42 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Viehmeyer v. Quijas

Case Details

Full title:Robbie VIEHMEYER, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. J. QUIJAS, Santa Ana Officer (…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 16, 2003

Citations

68 F. App'x 42 (9th Cir. 2003)