asserting that there are two separate exceptions under Louisiana law to the general rule that principals are not vicariously liable for the negligence of independent contractors
Summary of this case from Reliance Insurance v. The Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.No. 88-1727.
June 19, 1989.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 858 F. 2d 1075.
asserting that there are two separate exceptions under Louisiana law to the general rule that principals are not vicariously liable for the negligence of independent contractors
Summary of this case from Reliance Insurance v. The Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.considering certificate as evidence of whether, "in the mind of . . . counsel," a party had taken an appeal
Summary of this case from Walsh v. Ford Motor Co.Full title:VIDEO INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTIONS, Inc. v. WARNER-AMEX CABLE COMMUNICATIONS…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 19, 1989
Even the most generous "clarification" of the certificate, however, could not alter the broad terms of…
U.S. v. TaymanOthers, including the Fourth Circuit, reached this same conclusion with respect to claims raised collaterally…