Opinion
No. CV 07-4001833
October 16, 2007
Memorandum of Decision
After considering the testimony and reviewing the exhibits, the court concludes that the respondent warden has not engaged in "`deliberate indifference' to [the] petitioner's medical needs." Hunnicut v. Commissioner of Correction, 67 Conn.App. 65, 69, 787 A.2d 22 (2001). While a solution to the petitioner's constipation has been elusive, the respondent has not ignored the problem. Rather, the respondent has given the petitioner's medical needs ample attention and has expressed a willingness to continue to adjust the petitioner's medication in hopes of improving the petitioner's condition. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.
It is so ordered.