From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vidal v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 31, 2022
1:21CV1510 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 31, 2022)

Opinion

1:21CV1510

01-31-2022

SANDRA VIDAL o/b/o S.L.V., Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


SENTENCE-FOUR REMAND ORDER

Benita Y. Pearson, United States District Judge.

An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied Plaintiff Sandra Vidal's application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) on behalf of her minor child, S.L.V. after a hearing in the above-captioned case. That decision became the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security when the Appeals Council denied the request to review the ALJ's decision. The claimant sought judicial review of the Commissioner's decision.

The Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(1). In October 2021, the case was reassigned from Magistrate Judge Burke to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp pursuant to General Order 2021-15.

Pending is the parties' Joint Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner (ECF No. 12) under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties stipulate that the Court remand the matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings and a new decision.

Sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), states:

The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.

Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and the case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings and a new decision. On remand, the Appeals Council shall remand this case to the ALJ for further development of the administrative record as necessary to determine whether S.L.V. is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. After completing the foregoing and conducting any development of the record the ALJ deems appropriate, the ALJ shall issue a new decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vidal v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 31, 2022
1:21CV1510 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Vidal v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA VIDAL o/b/o S.L.V., Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 31, 2022

Citations

1:21CV1510 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 31, 2022)