From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vida v. McGowen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 15, 2017
No. 3:17-cv-0484-AC (D. Or. Jun. 15, 2017)

Opinion

No. 3:17-cv-0484-AC

06-15-2017

GEORGE VIDA, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA MCGOWEN, Defendant.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge John Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [3] on March 30, 2017, in which he recommends dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice.

Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation [3]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint [1] is dismissed without prejudice and the Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend. Any amended complaint is due within fourteen days of the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 15day of June, 2017.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Vida v. McGowen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 15, 2017
No. 3:17-cv-0484-AC (D. Or. Jun. 15, 2017)
Case details for

Vida v. McGowen

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE VIDA, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA MCGOWEN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 15, 2017

Citations

No. 3:17-cv-0484-AC (D. Or. Jun. 15, 2017)