From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Victorick v. Seiler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Apr 22, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-14-800 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-14-800

04-22-2014

DAVID LEE VICTORICK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL T. SEILER, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

On Friday, March 28, 2014, David Lee Victorick filed a complaint against the defendants seeking to enjoin the state-court criminal trial scheduled to proceed against him on Monday, March 31, 2014. (Docket Entry No. 1). On March 31, 2014, the court held an emergency hearing to consider whether a temporary injunction should issue against the state-court prosecution. After hearing from both parties, the court denied the request for a temporary injunction as stated on the record. (Docket Entry No. 4). The state-court prosecution proceeded and, on April 3, 2014, a judgment of guilty was entered against Victorick. (Docket Entry No. 5-1).

Victorick only sought to enjoin the state-court prosecution. The court's ruling and the state-court's entry of judgment disposes of his complaint. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Docket Entry Nos. 3 and 5 are denied as moot. This is a final judgment.

SIGNED on April 22, 2014, at Houston, Texas.

___________

Lee H. Rosenthal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Victorick v. Seiler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Apr 22, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-14-800 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2014)
Case details for

Victorick v. Seiler

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LEE VICTORICK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL T. SEILER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Apr 22, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-14-800 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2014)