From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Victor v. Prack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 2009
64 A.D.3d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 505788.

July 2, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Victor Woodard, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Rose, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur.


At the conclusion of a tier III prison disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of making threats. That determination, which was affirmed upon administrative appeal, was based upon a threatening letter which was found to have been authored by petitioner. This CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report and corroborating hearing testimony, together with the comparison of the offending letter and exemplars of petitioner's handwriting, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Koehl v Fischer, 52 AD3d 1070, 1071, appeal dismissed 11 NY3d 809). Petitioner's claim that the Hearing Officer failed to perform an independent handwriting analysis is wholly belied by the record.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Victor v. Prack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 2009
64 A.D.3d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Victor v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of VICTOR WOODARD, Petitioner, v. ALBERT PRACK, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 2, 2009

Citations

64 A.D.3d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5666
881 N.Y.S.2d 338

Citing Cases

In re Woodard

Decided October 22, 2009. Reported below, 64 AD3d 842. Motion for leave to appeal…

In re Woodard

April 9, 2010. Appeal from the 3rd Dept: 64 AD3d 842. Appeals Withdrawn and…