Opinion
10-19-2017
In re VICTOR M.N. III, Petitioner–Appellant, v. NORMA G. C., Respondent–Respondent.
Leslie S. Lowenstein, Woodmere, for appellant. Kenneth M. Tuccillo, Hastings on Hudson, for respondent. Karen P. Simmons, The Children's Law Center, Brooklyn (Janet Neustaetter of Counsel), attorney for the Child.
Leslie S. Lowenstein, Woodmere, for appellant.
Kenneth M. Tuccillo, Hastings on Hudson, for respondent.Karen P. Simmons, The Children's Law Center, Brooklyn (Janet Neustaetter of Counsel), attorney for the Child.
We have reviewed the record and agree with assigned counsel that there are no viable arguments to be raised on appeal (Matter of Weems v. Administration for Children's Servs., 73 A.D.3d 617, 900 N.Y.S.2d 859 [1st Dept.2010] ). The parties' child has turned 18 and thus is no longer subject to Family Court's visitation order (see Family Ct. Act § 651[b] ; Matter of Lozada v. Pinto, 7 A.D.3d 801, 776 N.Y.S.2d 860 [2d Dept.2004] ).
MANZANET–DANIELS, J.P., MAZZARELLI, MOSKOWITZ, KAHN, and KERN, JJ., concur.