Opinion
Civil Action 21-CV-5077
07-26-2022
VICTAULIC COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. HITHERM, LLC, et al. Defendants.
ORDER
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.
AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2022, after review of the pending motions, having held argument thereto and pursuant to the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant Difranchesco's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. He is dismissed from the case for a lack of personal jurisdiction;
2. Defendant Sufi's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED;
3. Defendant HiTHerm's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; and
4. Plaintiff's Motion to Enjoin is GRANTED. Defendants are restrained and enjoined from proceeding with the litigation in the California court, and in any other case that may include the parties and matters at issue herein.