From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vickle v. Minnesota

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 17, 2023
23-cv-618 (ECT/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 17, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-618 (ECT/TNL)

07-17-2023

Douglas Van Vickle, Petitioner, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Eric C. Tostrud, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung issued a Report and Recommendation on June 15, 2023. ECF No. 8. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] is ACCEPTED;
2. Petitioner Douglas Van Vickle's Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED without prejudice;
3. Petitioner's Motion for Post-Conviction Remedy [ECF No. 2] and his application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 5] are DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Vickle v. Minnesota

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 17, 2023
23-cv-618 (ECT/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Vickle v. Minnesota

Case Details

Full title:Douglas Van Vickle, Petitioner, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 17, 2023

Citations

23-cv-618 (ECT/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 17, 2023)