Opinion
Court of Appeals Case No. 49A02-1702-PL-330
12-19-2017
Craig Vickery, Appellant-Defendant, v. Ardagh Glass Inc., Appellee-Plaintiff
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT Kevin W. Betz Sandra L. Blevins Benjamin C. Ellis Betz + Blevins Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Adam Arceneaux Derek R. Molter Kaitlyn J. Marschke Ice Miller LLP Indianapolis, Indiana
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON REHEARING
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT
Kevin W. Betz
Sandra L. Blevins
Benjamin C. Ellis
Betz + Blevins
Indianapolis, Indiana
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Adam Arceneaux
Derek R. Molter
Kaitlyn J. Marschke
Ice Miller LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
Appeal from the Marion Superior Court, Indiana Commercial Court
The Honorable Heather A. Welch, Judge
Trial Court Cause No. 49D01-1606-PL-23465
Baker, Judge.
[1] The appellant's petition for rehearing contains a multitude of examples of the following language:
• "This Opinion is grossly erroneous."
• "This Opinion . . . provides sua sponte the most deficient and defective due process waiver analysis in the history of Indiana jurisprudence . . . ."
• "astonishing material inaccuracies and significant errors"
• "in the entire history of Indiana jurisprudence, no opinion . . . has been so cursory or deficient in its legal analysis"
Pet'n for Reh. p. 6-7. The appellant claims to be "mindful of the limitations of criticism for counsel[.]" Id. at p. 6 n.1. Apparently not. We encourage counsel to use more respectful and measured language in the future and by separate order deny the request for oral argument on rehearing.
[2] Our original decision stands, and in all other respects, we deny the petition for rehearing.
Bailey, J., and Altice, J., concur.