Vick v. State

6 Citing cases

  1. Washington v. State

    276 Ga. 655 (Ga. 2003)   Cited 88 times
    Holding that a direct appeal is available if the trial court grants permission to file an out-of-time motion for new trial before denying the previously untimely motion on its merits

    Where, however, a party obtains permission from the trial court to file an out-of-time motion for new trial and the trial court then denies the motion on its merits, a party is entitled to file a direct appeal in which the appellate court addresses the merits of the appeal from the denial of the out-of-time motion for new trial. Bohannon v. State, 262 Ga. 697 ( 425 S.E.2d 653) (1993); Vick v. State, 237 Ga. App. 762 ( 516 S.E.2d 815) (1999). See also Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 328 ( 489 S.E.2d 129) (1997) (where the trial court did not grant leave to file an out-of-time motion for new trial, the pleading is treated as an extraordinary motion for new trial, the appeal of the denial of which must come by application under OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(7)).

  2. Brown v. State

    646 S.E.2d 289 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 3 times

    Brown has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion or exercised it in such a way as to involve a deprivation of right. See Vick v. State, 237 Ga. App. 762, 763 (2) ( 516 SE2d 815) (1999); Bryan v. State, 148 Ga. App. 428 (1) ( 251 SE2d 338) (1978). See Jackson v. State, 149 Ga. App. 496, 498 (1) ( 254 SE2d 739) (1979).

  3. Mayo v. State

    626 S.E.2d 245 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 7 times

    (b) Although Mayo claims in his enumeration of error generally that insufficient evidence supports his possession of marijuana conviction, he makes no argument with regard to this conviction in his brief. As a result, we deem it abandoned pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 25 (c) (2). Vick v. State, 237 Ga. App. 762, 763 (1) ( 516 SE2d 815) (1999). 2.

  4. Daguilar v. State

    275 Ga. App. 756 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 7 times

    While the trial court properly allowed the appointed public defender to assist Daguilar, and even gave them time to practice whispering, it would have been improper for the trial court to allow the attorney, who was acting solely as an advisor, to conduct aspects of the trial after Daguilar exercised his right of self-representation. Cargill v. State, 255 Ga. 616, 622-623 (3) ( 340 SE2d 891) (1986); Vick v. State, 237 Ga. App. 762, 763 (2) ( 516 SE2d 815) (1999).Judgment affirmed.

  5. Melvin v. State

    542 S.E.2d 140 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 1 times

    Melvin's attorney also argued that the prosecutor was improperly injecting his personal feelings into the closing argument, but Melvin does not address this contention on appeal. Accordingly, this argument is deemed abandoned. See Vick v. State, 237 Ga. App. 762, 763 (1) ( 516 S.E.2d 815) (1999). If a defendant is dissatisfied with a trial court's curative instruction, it is incumbent upon him either to move for a mistrial or to request additional relief, and failure to do so precludes appellate review.

  6. Moore v. State

    246 Ga. App. 163 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 37 times

    In his first enumeration of error, Moore challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions for aggravated sodomy against his first victim. By failing to provide any argument with respect to his other convictions, Moore has abandoned any argument that the evidence was insufficient to support those convictions. See Vick v. State, 237 Ga. App. 762, 763 (1) ( 516 S.E.2d 815) (1999). With respect to Moore's conviction for aggravated sodomy, he provides no legal authority whatsoever.