From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Viart-Sotolongo v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Oct 10, 2018
255 So. 3d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 3D17-1411

10-10-2018

Renan VIART-SOTOLONGO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Eric J. Eves, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Eric J. Eves, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Craycraft, 704 So.2d 593, 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding that a warrant was not necessary for officers' second "entry" into a property where exigent circumstances made the officers' first entry lawful, the evidence seized during the second entry was observed during the first entry, and "[t]he second ‘entry’ was clearly part of one continuous episode.")


Summaries of

Viart-Sotolongo v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Oct 10, 2018
255 So. 3d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Viart-Sotolongo v. State

Case Details

Full title:Renan Viart-Sotolongo, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Oct 10, 2018

Citations

255 So. 3d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)