From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Viahart, LLC v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Feb 26, 2021
CASE NO. 6:18-CV-604-RWS-KNM (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2021)

Opinion

CASE NO. 6:18-CV-604-RWS-KNM

02-26-2021

VIAHART, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DOES 1-54, Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 51), recommending Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Docket No. 42) be granted. This trademark infringement action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell under 28 U.S.C. § 636. After holding an evidentiary hearing and ordering supplemental briefing, the Magistrate Judge entered her Report on January 29, 2021. See Docket No. 51. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge ordered Viahart to serve the Report on the defaulting defendants and interested third parties by February 12, 2021. Id. at 25. Viahart complied with that instruction on February 3, 2021. See Docket No. 52.

No party has filed objections; accordingly, they are not entitled to de novo review of those findings, conclusions and recommendations, and, except upon grounds of plain error, they are barred from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge and agrees with the Report. See United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 683 (1980) ("[T]he statute permits the district court to give to the magistrate's proposed findings of fact and recommendations 'such weight as [their] merit commands and the sound discretion of the judge warrants[.]'") (quoting Mathews v. Weber, 23 U.S. 261, 275 (1976)).

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Docket No. 42) is GRANTED.

SIGNED this 26th day of February, 2021.

/s/_________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Viahart, LLC v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Feb 26, 2021
CASE NO. 6:18-CV-604-RWS-KNM (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Viahart, LLC v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:VIAHART, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DOES 1-54, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Feb 26, 2021

Citations

CASE NO. 6:18-CV-604-RWS-KNM (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2021)

Citing Cases

Viahart, LLC v. Does 1-54

The Court also permanently enjoined the defaulting defendants from further infringement or counterfeiting of…