Opinion
2:20-CV-2173-JAM-DMC
11-04-2021
JULIE VI-GEANT, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS D. VIGEANT, Defendant.
ORDER
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.
On September 7, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 7, 2021, are adopted in full;
2. This action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.