Opinion
No. 18,065.
Filed October 17, 1950. Rehearing denied November 13, 1950.
MASTER AND SERVANT — Unemployment Compensation Laws — Proceedings To Secure Benefits — Review — Briefs — Failure To Comply With Supreme Court Rules — Decision Affirmed. — On appeal by a claimant from a decision of the Review Board denying unemployment benefits where the claimant's brief was not in compliance with the Rules of the Supreme Court so that the Appellate Court could not determine therefrom the questions presented, and where the appellees' brief supplied evidence sufficient to sustain the decision, the decision was affirmed. Rules of the Supreme Court, 2-17.
From the Review Board of The Indiana Employment Security Division.
Proceeding by Howard W. Vezey for benefits under the Indiana Employment Security Act. From a decision of the Review Board denying benefits, he appeals.
Affirmed. By the court in banc.
Howard W. Vezey, of Hammond, pro se. J. Emmett McManamon, Attorney General, Glen F. Kline, Chief Counsel, Indiana Employment Security Division, and Allen P. Twyman, of East Chicago, for appellees.
This is an attempt to appeal from the following decision of the Review Board of the Indiana Security Division:
"The Review Board holds that the claimants' unemployment during the calendar weeks involved in the period from October 1, 1949, to November 24, 1949, was due to a stoppage of work which resulted from a labor dispute in the establishment of this employer and in which they were directly interested and thus ineligible for the waiting period or benefit rights during any of such calendar weeks. The decision of the Referee is accordingly affirmed."
Appellant's brief does not comply with Rule 2-17, Rules of the Supreme Court. All we can gather from his brief is that he believes the decision of the Board is wrong. Appellees, in their brief, have supplied evidence which is sufficient to sustain the decision.
Decision affirmed.
NOTE. — Reported in 94 N.E.2d 494.