From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vetter v. Roth

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 19, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00844-JLK-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 19, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-00844-JLK-BNB.

August 19, 2010


ORDER


This matter arises on the parties' Stipulation, Dismissal of Parties and Joinder of Party [Doc. # 21, filed 8/18/2010] (the "Motion").

The parties appear to invoke Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Fed.R.Civ.P., which permits dismissal of a party with the written consent of all parties who have appeared. Consequently, on the stipulation of the parties and without any action by the court, the John Doe defendant and defendants Fisher, Nichol, and Pace have been dismissed from the action.

Rule 15(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., allows the amendment of an action "with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave." The Rule also provides that leave to amend should be "freely given . . . when justice so requires."

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion [Doc. # 21] is GRANTED. By the stipulation of the parties, defendants John Doe, Fisher, Nichol, and Pace are dismissed from the action without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is amended to add as a defendant James Hovey, individually and in his capacity as a Deputy Sheriff for Adams County. Hovey shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint within 14 days of the date of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case caption is amended as indicated above.


Summaries of

Vetter v. Roth

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 19, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00844-JLK-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Vetter v. Roth

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. VETTER, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW ROTH, individually and in his…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Aug 19, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-00844-JLK-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 19, 2010)