From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vest v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 20, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-256-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-256-KRG-KAP

02-20-2013

SEAN VEST, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b) (1), and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on January 30, 2013, docket no. 4, recommending that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied.

The plaintiff was notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1), he had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed timely objections, docket no. 5.

After de novo review of the record, the Report and Recommendation, and the timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2013, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, docket no. 3, is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Because plaintiff has not yet paid the filing fee, for administrative purposes only the Clerk shall mark this matter closed. If plaintiff pays the filing fee within 30 days of the date of this Order, the Clerk shall re-open the matter. Thereafter plaintiff shall make service of the complaint at his expense within 120 days of the payment of the filing fee, or the complaint shall be dismissed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) without further notice. If plaintiff does not timely pay the filing fee, the matter shall be considered dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution.

BY THE COURT:

______________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:

Sean Vest, Reg. No. 14336-026
F.C.I. Loretto
P.O. Box 1000
Loretto, PA 15940


Summaries of

Vest v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 20, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-256-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Vest v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SEAN VEST, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-256-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2013)