From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vessell v. Dickens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17cv36 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 26, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17cv36

09-26-2017

LEON D. VESSELL v. PATRICK DICKENS, ET AL.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Leon D. Vessell, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable orders of this court.

Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking a default judgment (docket entry 9). The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending the motion be denied.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. The motion for default judgment is DENIED.

So Ordered and Signed

Sep 26, 2017

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Vessell v. Dickens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17cv36 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 26, 2017)
Case details for

Vessell v. Dickens

Case Details

Full title:LEON D. VESSELL v. PATRICK DICKENS, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 26, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17cv36 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 26, 2017)