From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vesey Associates, Inc. v. Levine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1968
31 A.D.2d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

December 10, 1968


Order entered April 25, 1967, is unanimously modified on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion to reverse that portion of the order which denied the plaintiff's motion to add, as parties-defendant to the action, the Broadway-Worth Corp., and Herbert Friedman, and the motion is granted, and as modified the order is affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the plaintiff. In this suit the plaintiff seeks specific performance of an option to purchase the property known as 325 Broadway. Should the plaintiff be successful there will still be open an undetermined question as to whether the parties, sought to be added, have some interest in the property. It is desirable to have an adjudication which will finally determine what, if any, interest any party has in this property. The only objection raised to adding Broadway-Worth Corp. and Herbert Friedman is that it would delay the trial of this suit to the disadvantage of the present defendants. We conclude that there is no merit to this contention inasmuch as, in the circumstances of this case, there need be no undue delay.

Concur — Eager, J.P., Steuer, Rabin, McNally and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Vesey Associates, Inc. v. Levine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1968
31 A.D.2d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Vesey Associates, Inc. v. Levine

Case Details

Full title:VESEY ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. SIDNEY LEVINE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1968

Citations

31 A.D.2d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Maurer v. Albany Sand Supply Company

a verdict in favor of respondent, the net result of which was that he was granted specific performance of a…

Barnum v. Frickey

We also agree with the trial court that the Frickeys were not bona fide purchasers for value because they…