Versatop Support Sys., Inc. v. Ga. Expo, Inc.

Full title: VERSATOP SUPPORT SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. GEORGIA EXPO, INC.…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 13, 2017

3:15-CV-02030-JE (D. Or. Apr. 13, 2017)

Opinion

3:15-CV-02030-JE

04-13-2017

VERSATOP SUPPORT SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. GEORGIA EXPO, INC., Defendant.

BROWN, Judge.

ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation (#45) on February 16, 2017, in which he recommends the Court grant Defendant's Motion (#34) for Summary Judgment and deny Plaintiff's Cross-Motion (#38) for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9^th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9^th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation (#45) and, therefore, GRANTS Defendant's Motion (#34) for Summary Judgment and DENIES Plaintiff's Cross-Motion (#38) for Summary Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 13^th day of April, 2017.

/s/_________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge