Opinion
No. 388.
Decided April 17, 1961.
Consent judgment having been entered by District Court since reversal by Court of Appeals, judgment of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded with directions to dismiss appeal as moot.
Reported below: 278 F.2d 464.
James J. Morrison, Arthur A. de la Houssaye and Raymond H. Kierr for petitioners.
Eberhard P. Deutsch for respondents.
It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that, subsequent to the judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals of the judgment of the District Court and the filing and granting of the petition for writ of certiorari, a consent judgment was entered by the District Court and that said judgment has been satisfied, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the appeal as moot.