From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Verosko v. Nolan

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 1, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-25 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-25 Erie.

June 1, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This action was received by the Clerk of Court on February 2, 2010, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 6], filed on May 10, 2010, recommended that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff was allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections and service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2010;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 6] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on May 10, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The clerk is directed to mark the case closed.


Summaries of

Verosko v. Nolan

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 1, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-25 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Verosko v. Nolan

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL VEROSKO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL NOLAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 1, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-25 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2010)