From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vernon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 29, 1990
558 So. 2d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2931.

March 29, 1990.

A Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Original jurisdiction.

Antony E. Fiorentino, Pensacola, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and William A. Hatch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


At petitioner's implied consent hearing held pursuant to Section 322.261, Florida Statutes (1987), the county court placed the burden of proof on petitioner, and ultimately sustained the suspension of petitioner's driver's license. The circuit court affirmed. After petitioner filed a petition for writ of certiorari, the respondent confessed error, stating that the burden of proof in a section 322.261 hearing should be on the state. We therefore grant the petition for writ of certiorari and remand this case for further consistent proceedings.

ERVIN, ZEHMER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vernon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 29, 1990
558 So. 2d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Vernon v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL COOPER VERNON, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 29, 1990

Citations

558 So. 2d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Dept. of Hwy. Safety v. Farley

He contends that his own failure to testify as to any violation of the Rule ( i.e., oral consumption of any…