From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vernon v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Jun 1, 1898
40 A. 419 (R.I. 1898)

Opinion

June 1, 1898.

PRESENT: Matteson, C.J., Stiness and Tillinghast, JJ.

When the persons interested in the subject-matter of a suit in equity are numerous, a bill may be filed by one or more complainants in his or their behalf, and in behalf of all others interested who may come in and take on themselves the prosecution of the suit.

BILL IN EQUITY for an accounting and discovery. Heard on demurrer to the bill averring that all persons interested had not been made parties to the suit.

Charles Acton Ives, for complainants.

Samuel R. Honey, for respondent.


Though the general rule is that all persons interested in the subject-matter of the suit should be made parties, an exception is allowed where the parties are numerous. In such case a bill may be filed by one or more complainants in his or their behalf, and in behalf of all others interested who may come in and take on themselves the prosecution of the suit. 1 Dan. Ch. Pr., 6 Am. ed. *p. 216, note 6; Adams Eq. 5 Am. Ed. *pp. 320-21, and note 1; Story Eq. Pl. Pr., 10 ed. § 97. The bill in the present case comes within this exception. Our opinion is, therefore, that it is sufficient, and that the plea of want of parties should be overruled.


Summaries of

Vernon v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Jun 1, 1898
40 A. 419 (R.I. 1898)
Case details for

Vernon v. Reynolds

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE E. VERNON, Executor, et al. vs. GARDINER B. REYNOLDS

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE

Date published: Jun 1, 1898

Citations

40 A. 419 (R.I. 1898)
40 A. 419

Citing Cases

Whipple v. Guile

This practice has been recognized in this State. See Hazard v. Durant, 9 R.I. 602; Vernon v. Reynolds, 20…

Oskoian v. Canuel

08 (2d ed. 1948). The state courts in Rhode Island will entertain a nonbinding class suit of a "spurious"…