Opinion
2:23-cv-01180-JNW
12-15-2023
CORLIS VERNON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CLOSETS BY DESIGN, INC. and CBD FRANCHISING, INC., Defendants.
Simon C. Franzini (Cal. Bar No. 287631)* DOVEL & LUNER, LLP Wright A. Noel, WSBA No. 25264 Carson & Noel, PLLC Counsel for Plaintiff REEDER MCCREARY, LLP Duncan McCreary * Christopher S. Reeder * Zachary E. Davison, WSBA No. 47873 Byron C. Starkey, WSBA No. 55545 Perkins Coie LLP Counsel for Defendants *Admitted Pro Hac Vice
NOTE FOR MOTION CALENDAR: December 13, 2023
Simon C. Franzini (Cal. Bar No. 287631)*
DOVEL & LUNER, LLP
Wright A. Noel, WSBA No. 25264
Carson & Noel, PLLC
Counsel for Plaintiff
REEDER MCCREARY, LLP
Duncan McCreary *
Christopher S. Reeder *
Zachary E. Davison, WSBA No. 47873
Byron C. Starkey, WSBA No. 55545
Perkins Coie LLP
Counsel for Defendants
*Admitted Pro Hac Vice
STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
JAMAL N. WHITEHEAD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATED MOTION
Pursuant to LCR 7(d)(1) and LCR (10)(g), Plaintiff Corlis Vernon (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Closets by Design, Inc. and CBD Franchising, Inc. (“Defendants”), hereby submit this stipulated motion to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 27) and for Defendants to reply in support of their motion. In support of this motion, the parties state as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint in this Court on October 13, 2023.
2. Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction on November 15, 2023.
3. According to the Court's Order Granting the parties' Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 32), Plaintiff's current deadline to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is December 18, 2023, and Defendants' deadline to reply in support of its motion is January 5, 2023.
4. The parties have stipulated and agreed to extend Plaintiff's and Defendants' deadlines to December 22, 2023, and January 10, 2024, respectively.
5. The parties' request the extensions due to the intervening December holidays, as well as pre-existing deadlines in counsel's other cases. The requested extensions are for good cause and are not meant to improperly delay this proceeding.
6. This is the parties' second request for an extension of time regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint.
7. This change in deadlines will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
WHEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and move the Court to grant Plaintiff an extension of time to file and serve her response to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to December 22, 2023, and for Defendants to file and serve their reply on January 10, 2024.
ORDER
As described by the above Stipulated Motion, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Plaintiff shall file and serve her response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss no later than December 22, 2023, and Defendants shall file and serve their reply no later than January 10, 2024.