From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vermilyea v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Apr 3, 2014
NO. 14-13-00218-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 14-13-00218-CR

04-03-2014

DANIEL MICAH VERMILYEA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


Memorandum Opinion issued March 20, 2014 Withdrawn; Affirmed and Substitute Memorandum Opinion filed April 3, 2014.

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1335846


SUBSTITUTE MEMORANDUM OPINION

We withdraw the opinion issued March 20, 2014 and issue this opinion in its place. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to indecency with a child. On March 8, 2013, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for nine years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.

Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant's request, the record was provided to him. On March 24, 2014, appellant filed a pro se response to counsel's brief.

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's response, and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Brown.
Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Vermilyea v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Apr 3, 2014
NO. 14-13-00218-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Vermilyea v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL MICAH VERMILYEA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 3, 2014

Citations

NO. 14-13-00218-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2014)