Verma v. Ninpo Sur.

Full title: Rakesh Verma, Appellant, v. Ninpo Surety, City of Jacksonville…

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Jul 2, 2021

No. 1D20-791 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 2, 2021)

Opinion

1D20-791

07-02-2021

Rakesh Verma, Appellant, v. Ninpo Surety, City of Jacksonville, Jacksonville Sheriff's Office, Florida Department of Financial Services, Neha Verma, Pushpa Verma, Appellees.

Rakesh Verma, pro se, Appellant. Ashley B. Rutherford, Assistant General Counsel, City of Jacksonville Office of General Counsel, Jacksonville, for Appellees City of Jacksonville and Jacksonville Sheriff's Office. Max McCann, Executive Senior Attorney, and Katie B. Privett, Senior Attorney, Department of Financial Services Office of the General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Financial Services. Lawrence C. Rolfe of Rolfe & Lobello, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee Ninpo Surety.

Per Curiam.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Bruce Anderson, Judge.

Rakesh Verma, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Rutherford, Assistant General Counsel, City of Jacksonville Office of General Counsel, Jacksonville, for Appellees City of Jacksonville and Jacksonville Sheriff's Office.

Max McCann, Executive Senior Attorney, and Katie B. Privett, Senior Attorney, Department of Financial Services Office of the General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Financial Services.

Lawrence C. Rolfe of Rolfe & Lobello, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee Ninpo Surety.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

B.L. Thomas, Osterhaus, and MK Thomas, JJ., concur.