From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Verma v. Ninpo Sur.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 2, 2021
321 So. 3d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-791

07-02-2021

Rakesh VERMA, Appellant, v. NINPO SURETY, City of Jacksonville, Jacksonville Sheriff's Office, Florida Department of Financial Services, Neha Verma, Pushpa Verma, Appellees.

Rakesh Verma, pro se, Appellant. Ashley B. Rutherford, Assistant General Counsel, City of Jacksonville Office of General Counsel, Jacksonville, for Appellees City of Jacksonville and Jacksonville Sheriff's Office. Max McCann, Executive Senior Attorney, and Katie B. Privett, Senior Attorney, Department of Financial Services Office of the General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Financial Services. Lawrence C. Rolfe of Rolfe & Lobello, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee Ninpo Surety.



DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Verma v. Ninpo Sur.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 2, 2021
321 So. 3d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Verma v. Ninpo Sur.

Case Details

Full title:Rakesh VERMA, Appellant, v. NINPO SURETY, City of Jacksonville…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jul 2, 2021

Citations

321 So. 3d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)