Verizon N.Y., Inc. v. Supervisor of Town of Hempstead

Full title: Verizon New York, Inc., formerly known as New York Telephone Company…

Court: Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: May 24, 2016

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 74388 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2015-11168 2015-11170 2015-11171 2015-11180 2015-11184

05-24-2016

Verizon New York, Inc., formerly known as New York Telephone Company, plaintiff-respondent, v. Supervisor of Town of Hempstead, et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents Town of Hempstead Sanitary District 1, et al., defendants-respondents; County of Nassau, et al., third-party defendants-appellants. (Actions No. 1) (Actions No. 2) New York Telephone Company, plaintiff-respondent, v. Supervisor of Town of Hempstead, et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents, Town of Hempstead Sanitary District 1, et al., defendants-respondents; County of Nassau, et al., third-party defendants-appellants. (Actions No. 3) (Actions No. 4) (Actions No. 5)

L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P.

M212050

E/sl

L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P.

ROBERT J. MILLER

HECTOR D. LASALLE

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

(Index Nos. 6858/02, 6578/01)

(Index Nos. 6794/00, 11522/99, 12177/98)

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the third-party defendants-appellants on appeals in related actions from five judgments of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, all dated June 23, 2015 (one in each action), inter alia, to deem the brief to be filed in connection with the appeal under Appellate Division Docket No. 2015-11168 to also be filed in connection with the other appeals, and to enlarge the time to perfect the appeals.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the appeals are consolidated, the parties shall serve and file a single record or appendix for all of the appeals and a single brief containing their points of arguments with respect to all of the appeals, responsive arguments, or arguments in reply, as the case may be, the parties shall file 13 copies of the record or appendix and their respective briefs, the time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until July 25, 2016, and the motion is otherwise denied.

HALL, J.P., MILLER, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court