From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Verive v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Nov 3, 2015
474 S.W.3d 220 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 102134

11-03-2015

Joseph A. Verive, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Amy M. Bartholow, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO. 65203, for appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.


Amy M. Bartholow, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO. 65203, for appellant.

Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Verive (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Pike County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his motion because plea counsel was ineffective for (1) failing to provide Movant with discovery, and (2) failing to contact two witnesses.

We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Verive v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Nov 3, 2015
474 S.W.3d 220 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Case details for

Verive v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joseph A. Verive, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Nov 3, 2015

Citations

474 S.W.3d 220 (E.D. Mo. 2015)