From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Verhovec v. City of Trotwood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 31, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-363 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-363

03-31-2015

EDWARD VERHOVEC, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TROTWOOD, OHIO, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 51), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired on March 12, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that Motion of Defendants City of Trotwood and Michael J. Lucking and Putative Counterclaim Defendants Stephen McHugh and Amelia Blankenship to Dismiss the Counterclaim of William E. Walker, Jr. (Doc. No. 35) be, and it hereby is GRANTED and the Counterclaim of William E. Walker, Jr. (Doc. No. 31), is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. March 31, 2015.

/s/_________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Verhovec v. City of Trotwood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 31, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-363 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2015)
Case details for

Verhovec v. City of Trotwood

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD VERHOVEC, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TROTWOOD, OHIO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 31, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-363 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2015)