From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Verhoev v. Prog. Cty Mutual

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Dec 3, 2009
No. 02-08-055-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 3, 2009)

Opinion

No. 02-08-055-CV

Delivered: December 3, 2009.

Appealed from the 67th District Court of Tarrant County.

PANEL: GARDNER and WALKER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


We have considered the parties' "Agreed Motion For Dismissal Of Appeal." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we withdraw our prior opinion and judgment of July 30, 2009 and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f). Appellant and appellee's motions for rehearing are denied as moot.

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.


Summaries of

Verhoev v. Prog. Cty Mutual

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Dec 3, 2009
No. 02-08-055-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 3, 2009)
Case details for

Verhoev v. Prog. Cty Mutual

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY VERHOEV, APPELLANT v. PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Dec 3, 2009

Citations

No. 02-08-055-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 3, 2009)

Citing Cases

Kidd v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Under his second issue, Kidd urges us to imply a common law separation of insureds doctrine, viewing each…

In re Progressive Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co.

Schwartz supported his interpretation of the Wieds' policy coverage by citing to an opinion that was…