From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vereen v. Clay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 19, 2018
Case No.: 1:17-cv-01058-VEH-SGC (N.D. Ala. Mar. 19, 2018)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:17-cv-01058-VEH-SGC

03-19-2018

LUTHER VEREEN, JR., Petitioner, v. WARDEN B. CLAY, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 20, 2018, the Magistrate issued a Report and Recommendation which, in pertinent part, stated:

the undersigned RECOMMENDS Vereen's § 2241 petition be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
(Doc. 2 at 5). On March 9, 2018, the Petitioner filed an Objection to the Magistrate's recommendation. (Doc. 5). Having carefully considered, de novo, all of the materials in the Court file, including the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrates Report and Recommendation ought to be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. The Court EXPRESSLY HOLDS that Vereen's § 2241 petition is due to be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An appropriate Final Order will be entered.

DONE this 19th day of March, 2018.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Vereen v. Clay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 19, 2018
Case No.: 1:17-cv-01058-VEH-SGC (N.D. Ala. Mar. 19, 2018)
Case details for

Vereen v. Clay

Case Details

Full title:LUTHER VEREEN, JR., Petitioner, v. WARDEN B. CLAY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 19, 2018

Citations

Case No.: 1:17-cv-01058-VEH-SGC (N.D. Ala. Mar. 19, 2018)