From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Venturino v. Takeda Pharm. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 4, 2017
MISC. CASE NO. 17-mc-59 (W.D. La. Apr. 4, 2017)

Opinion

MISC. CASE NO. 17-mc-59

04-04-2017

PATRICIA VENTURINO, ET AL. v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, ET AL


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA JUDGMENT ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Considering the foregoing Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Approve the Settlement of Patricia Venturino, as Administrator and Derivative Claimant, and Mary Roniger as Derivative Claimant, of the Estate of Arthur Roniger, is hereby GRANTED pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hanna, which is hereby adopted.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Lafayette, Louisiana, this 4th day of April, 2017.

/s/_________

REBECCA F. DOHERTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Venturino v. Takeda Pharm. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 4, 2017
MISC. CASE NO. 17-mc-59 (W.D. La. Apr. 4, 2017)
Case details for

Venturino v. Takeda Pharm. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA VENTURINO, ET AL. v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Apr 4, 2017

Citations

MISC. CASE NO. 17-mc-59 (W.D. La. Apr. 4, 2017)