From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Venters v. Bilpam Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 10, 1960
23 Misc. 2d 923 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

Opinion

February 10, 1960

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, WILLIAM T. O'CONNELL, J.

Rothbart, Rothstein Panken ( Irwin Panken of counsel), for appellants.

Bernard Helfenstein and Alvin I. Goidel for respondent.


Plaintiff testified without denial by defendant that she had fallen from a seat to which there was no back, in defendant's theatre where "There was never any lights up there", and that defendant's manager was aware of the condition.

Even if it were to be assumed that appellants abandoned the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur by attempting to bring forth affirmative proof attributing notice to the defendant of the alleged dangerous condition, notice to defendant was established through its manager Holder who had the job of supervising the operation of the theatre. Consequently, plaintiffs established a prima facie case which called for an explanation or rebuttal by defendant in order to be relieved of liability.

It was error, therefore, to dismiss the complaint at the conclusion of plaintiffs' case.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellants to abide the event.

Concur — HECHT, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Venters v. Bilpam Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 10, 1960
23 Misc. 2d 923 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
Case details for

Venters v. Bilpam Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HAZEL VENTERS et al., Appellants, v. BILPAM CORP., Doing Business as LANE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1960

Citations

23 Misc. 2d 923 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
200 N.Y.S.2d 472