From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vennings v. Leeke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 12, 2020
No. 19-2219 (4th Cir. Mar. 12, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-2219

03-12-2020

EARL VENNINGS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMELIA LEEKE, Esquire; RYAN HARRIS SIGAL, Esquire, Defendants - Appellees.

Earl Vennings, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (2:19-cv-02544-MGL) Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl Vennings, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Earl Vennings, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2018) Vennings' complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vennings v. Leeke, No. 2:19-cv-02544-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 31, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Vennings v. Leeke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 12, 2020
No. 19-2219 (4th Cir. Mar. 12, 2020)
Case details for

Vennings v. Leeke

Case Details

Full title:EARL VENNINGS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMELIA LEEKE, Esquire; RYAN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 12, 2020

Citations

No. 19-2219 (4th Cir. Mar. 12, 2020)

Citing Cases

Constant v. Law

In his Objections, Plaintiff contends that “the Complaint can be amended and refiled under the Bivens…