From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Venizelos v. Saad

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 13, 2020
No. 19-7207 (4th Cir. Mar. 13, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-7207

03-13-2020

JOHN VENIZELOS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JENNIFER SAAD, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

John Venizelos, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv-00119-GMG-RWT) Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Venizelos, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Venizelos appeals the district court's orders denying his motions for fees and costs and for reconsideration following the dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition. We have reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Venizelos v. Saad

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 13, 2020
No. 19-7207 (4th Cir. Mar. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Venizelos v. Saad

Case Details

Full title:JOHN VENIZELOS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JENNIFER SAAD, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 13, 2020

Citations

No. 19-7207 (4th Cir. Mar. 13, 2020)