From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veney v. Fine

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 1, 2016
642 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-6070

04-01-2016

LEMOYNE VENEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TAMERA LYNN FINE; MARK WALTER CROOKS; MANISHA GARNER; BRENDAN HURSON; ROBERT SPELKE, Defendants - Appellees.

Lemoyne Veney, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-cv-03965-RDB) Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lemoyne Veney, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lemoyne Vesey appeals the district court's order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Veney v. Fine, No. 1:15-cv-03965-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 8, 2016). We also deny Veney's motions to amend the complaint, to strike the district court's order, to disqualify the district court judge, to assign counsel, and for the production of transcripts and other documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Veney v. Fine

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 1, 2016
642 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Veney v. Fine

Case Details

Full title:LEMOYNE VENEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TAMERA LYNN FINE; MARK WALTER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 1, 2016

Citations

642 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2016)