Venable v. Lee

1 Citing case

  1. Associated Enterprises v. Toltec Watershed

    656 P.2d 1144 (Wyo. 1983)   Cited 2 times

    We hold that where the jury award exceeds the amount initially deposited to the credit of the condemnee, the condemnee is entitled to interest on the difference between amounts of just compensation fixed at the time of the order of award (time of taking) and later increased by the jury, measured from the date of the order of award. Venable v. Lee, 141 Ga. App. 159, 233 S.E.2d 3 (1977). There are cases holding that deposit or tender of an amount eventually found insufficient does not prevent a recovery of interest on the entire amount awarded the owner.