From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veloz v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 27, 2007
Case No. 3:06-cv-258-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jun. 27, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06-cv-258-KRG-KAP.

June 27, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on June 8, 2007, docket no. 7, recommending that the defendant's motion to dismiss, docket no. 5, be granted.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

Upon review of the record of this matter and the Report and Recommendation, and noting the absence of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2007, it is

ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss, docket no. 5, is granted. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Veloz v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 27, 2007
Case No. 3:06-cv-258-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jun. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Veloz v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Case Details

Full title:STEPHANIE VELOZ, Plaintiff, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 27, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:06-cv-258-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jun. 27, 2007)

Citing Cases

Gority v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.

As this court has noted, injuries caused by repetitive motion accrue when the injury first manifested itself.…