From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velez v. Clemenza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1990
167 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 13, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant was properly precluded from offering any evidence on the issue of liability at trial based on her failure to comply with the Supreme Court's conditional order of preclusion (see, Kaire v. Trump Mgt., 140 A.D.2d 494; Bernstein v. Burson, 126 A.D.2d 593; Metflex Corp. v. Klafter, 123 A.D.2d 845). Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment on the issue of liability, upon the plaintiffs' prima facie showing of their entitlement thereto (see, Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d 851). Mangano, P.J., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Velez v. Clemenza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1990
167 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Velez v. Clemenza

Case Details

Full title:LISA VELEZ, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, STELLA VELEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)