Opinion
22-cv-9107 (LAK)
10-26-2022
MARIA VELEZ, Plaintiff, v. CAN TRUCKING INC and LEESENT STAPLETON, Defendants
ORDER
Lewis A. Kaplan, United States District Judge
Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege:
[√] The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See. e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp. v. PaciftCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996).
[ ] The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1).
[ ] The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990).
[ ] The citizenship of one or more limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3a 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000).
[ ] The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities.
[ ] The timely removal of the action from state court.
In addition, the notice has not be joined in by all defendants.
Absent the filing, on or before November 2, 2022, of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded to the state court.
SO ORDERED.