From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velez v. ABC Auto & Glass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 15, 2009
65 A.D.3d 1138 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-08685.

September 15, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant John Rosatti appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), dated July 24, 2008, as granted the plaintiffs cross motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b for an extension of time to serve the summons and complaint upon him.

Faust Goetz Schenker Blee LLP, New York, N.Y. (Lisa L. Gokhulsingh of counsel), for appellant.

Scott J. Zlotolow, Sayville, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Covello, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs cross motion is denied.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs cross motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b to extend the time within which to serve the summons and complaint upon the defendant John Rosatti. Notwithstanding the expiration of the statute of limitations, the plaintiff did not demonstrate facts and circumstances that would support the grant of such relief in the interest of justice ( see Crystal v Lisnow, 56 AD3d 713; Otero v Flushing Hosp., 300 AD2d 639, 640; Rihal v Kirchhoff, 291 AD2d 548).

The appellant's remaining contention is not properly before this Court ( see Katz v Katz, 68 AD2d 536, 542-543).


Summaries of

Velez v. ABC Auto & Glass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 15, 2009
65 A.D.3d 1138 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Velez v. ABC Auto & Glass

Case Details

Full title:NITZA VELEZ, Respondent, v. ABC AUTO GLASS et al., Defendants, and JOHN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 15, 2009

Citations

65 A.D.3d 1138 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6539
885 N.Y.S.2d 204

Citing Cases

Lehman v. North Greenwich Landscaping, LLC

Moreover, the plaintiff did not cross-move pursuant to CPLR 306-b for leave to extend the time within which…