From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velez v. 2420 Davidson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2016
144 A.D.3d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-15-2016

Carlos VELEZ, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. 2420 DAVIDSON, et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Cascone & Kluepfel, LLP, Garden City (James K. O'Sullivan of counsel), for appellants. Joel Zuckerberg, Ossining, for respondent.


Cascone & Kluepfel, LLP, Garden City (James K. O'Sullivan of counsel), for appellants.

Joel Zuckerberg, Ossining, for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered January 19, 2016, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly found that triable issues of fact exist as to whether defendants created the dangerous condition of ice, on which plaintiff slipped and fell, or had actual or constructive notice of it (see generally Rodriguez v. 705–7 E. 179th St.

Hous. Dev. Fund Corp., 79 A.D.3d 518, 913 N.Y.S.2d 189 [1st Dept.2010] ).

RENWICK, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, KAPNICK, KAHN, GESMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Velez v. 2420 Davidson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2016
144 A.D.3d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Velez v. 2420 Davidson

Case Details

Full title:Carlos VELEZ, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. 2420 DAVIDSON, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 15, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
144 A.D.3d 493
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7590