Opinion
3:18cv2193/MCR/EMT
06-10-2021
EMMANUEL VELAZQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER REGINALD CROMARTIE, Defendant.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The district judge referred this matter to the undersigned to conduct an evidentiary hearing and any other required proceedings and to enter a report and recommendation on disposition of Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (see ECF No. 65).
On April 12, 2021, the undersigned conducted a telephonic cases management conference. Present for the conference were Plaintiff Velazquez and Defendant's counsel and paralegal, Attorney Lori Huskisson, Attorney Kristen Lonergan, and Paralegal Aman Dhaliwal. Following a discussion of matters relevant to an evidentiary hearing, Plaintiff determined he did not wish to proceed with an evidentiary hearing and instead wished to abide by the terms of the negotiated settlement.
Because Plaintiff no longer opposes enforcement of the parties' settlement agreement, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that:
Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (ECF No. 64) be GRANTED.
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES
Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within fourteen days of the date of the Report and Recommendation. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only and does not control. An objecting party must serve a copy of the objections on all other parties. A party who fails to object to the magistrate judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.